The reader must wait for the last writer to unlock the resource and readtry semaphores. No reader can engage in the entry section if the readtry semaphore has been set by a writer previously. The very last writer must release the readtry semaphore, thus opening the gate for readers to try reading. Only the first writer will lock the readtry and then all subsequent writers can simply use the resource as it gets freed by the previous writer. The writers on the other hand don't need to lock it individually. This is accomplished by forcing every reader to lock and release the readtry semaphore individually. In this solution, preference is given to the writers. Semaphore resource = 1 semaphore rmutex = 1 readcount = 0 /* resource.P() is equivalent to wait(resource) resource.V() is equivalent to signal(resource) rmutex.P() is equivalent to wait(rmutex) rmutex.V() is equivalent to signal(rmutex) */ writer () This is also called readers-preference, with its solution: This is the motivation for the first readers–writers problem, in which the constraint is added that no reader shall be kept waiting if the share is currently opened for reading. It would be foolish for R 2 to wait until R 1 was done before starting its own read operation instead, R 2 should be allowed to read the resource alongside R 1 because reads don't modify data, so concurrent reads are safe. However, this solution is sub-optimal, because it is possible that a reader R 1 might have the lock, and then another reader R 2 requests access. It is possible to protect the shared data behind a mutual exclusion mutex, in which case no two threads can access the data at the same time. Suppose we have a shared memory area (critical section) with the basic constraints detailed above. The basic reader–writers problem was first formulated and solved by Courtois et al. A readers–writer lock is a data structure that solves one or more of the readers–writers problems. (In particular, we want to prevent more than one thread modifying the shared resource simultaneously and allow for two or more readers to access the shared resource at the same time). Some threads may read and some may write, with the constraint that no thread may access the shared resource for either reading or writing while another thread is in the act of writing to it. There are at least three variations of the problems, which deal with situations in which many concurrent threads of execution try to access the same shared resource at one time. In computer science, the readers–writers problems are examples of a common computing problem in concurrency. ( Learn how and when to remove this template message) ( November 2016) ( Learn how and when to remove this template message) Please help improve it to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details. Here, a critical section refers to a period when the process accesses a shared resource, such as shared memory.Įxplanation : The following points should make the concept deeper and cleaner :-ġ) Mutexes have two basic operations, they are lock and unlock.Ģ) If a mutex is unlocked and a thread calls lock on that mutex, the mutex locks and the thread continues its operation (i.e opeartions in the crtical section).ģ) However, If the mutex is locked by some thread, then the other thread blocks until the thread 'holding' the lock calls unlock.This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. It is a basic requirement in concurrency control, to prevent race conditions. Well! Again according to the brainy Wikipedia, In computer science, mutual exclusion refers to the requirement of ensuring that no two concurrent processes are in their critical section at the same time. Hence POSIX Threads is actually a POSIX Standard for threads. In short, the focus is on the model of how the threads are created and manipulated.We use the various POSIX APIs to do so. Each flow of work is referred to as a Thread, and creation and control over these flows is achieved by making calls to the POSIX Threads API.Įxplanation : Though the definition is self explanatory, I would like to stress upon the word - execution model. It allows a program to control multiple different flows of work that overlap in time. Firstly, let's get some basic understanding of the components we will be using in the following program:Īccording to Wikipedia, POSIX Threads, usually referred to as Pthreads, is an example of an execution model that exists independently from a language, as well as an example of a parallel execution model.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |